The Internet and Public Policy in Qatar Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Internet and Public Policy in Qatar - Essay Example Eventually, the paper will discuss and provide a recommended plan on how this type of crime should be managed. Although Qatari government has not provided a clear definition of theft, this type of criminal act has been defined as â€Å"an unlawful act of stealing, taking, and removing of personal property with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it† (Merriam-Webster Online, 2009). Basically, â€Å"a person commits theft if he receives, retains, or disposes of the property of another knowing that it has been stolen, or believing that it has probably been stolen, with a purpose to deprive the owner thereof† (N.H. Rev. Sta. Ann.  § 637:1, 1, 1996). Although most of the existing definition of theft does not clearly state where and how the act of stealing another person’s property or information may occur, it remains clear that taking another person’s property or identity without the knowledge of Aside from the legally practicing the existing penal co de law on theft, Qatari government strongly supports the intellectual property rights (A Review of Intellectual Property-Related News and Developments in the Middle East and North Africa, 2007). For instance: The selling of pirated or selling counterfeited CDs is considered a crime related to theft. As part of Qatari government’s effort on implementing some international and regional strategies against transnational crime, an Intellectual Property Enforcement Office was recently been established. Software developers are among the common.

One Another by Their Morphology Essay Example for Free

One Another by Their Morphology Essay Bacteria can be distinguished from one another by their morphology (size, shape, and staining characteristics). In this lab experiment, bacterial morphology was examined by observing both stained and unstained organisms. A wet mount is a preparation process where a live specimen in culture fluid is placed on a slide and the organism is free to move about. In the wet mount slides provided via LabPaq software with cheek, dental plaque, and yeast specimens were observed. The wet mount preparations were difficult to observe because of poor contrast, however, a common occurrence in the specimens were cells large in size and translucent in color. The slides provided with direct staining using crystal violet gave the most imagining of morphology. The directly stained cells gave off a purplish hue to the cells, making them easier to visualize and classify. The indirect specimens stained with congo red provided translucent cells while others were a brownish red, however, the cellular characteristics were easily distinguishable. There was no experiment provided in which indirect staining using both congo red and crystal violet was undertaken. It may be hypothesized therefore that in this case one may observe both red and purple stains of cells depending upon the negative or positive component of the cell. Staining enhances the visualization of smears and reveals differential characteristics such as morphology. As stated previously, utilizing a wet mount prepared slide, the specimens were difficult to visualize. However, using the staining methods, specific bacterial morphologies were identified. For example, at 100x, a direct stain of yeast returned a cluster of cocci. A stain is a chemical that adheres to structures of the microorganism and in effect dyes the microorganism so the microorganism can be easily seen under a microscope. Stains used in microbiology are either basic (direct) or acidic (indirect). Basic dyes are used for positive or direct staining and the specimen is stained while the background remains clear. Indirect staining is preparing colorless bacteria against a colored background. Acidic dyes are used for negative staining. In the experiments, the smears in each type of staining did not appear different in each type of staining. For example in the direct stain of the check, the cells appeared irregularly round shaped with a nucleus. With the indirect stain, the cheek cells had the same appearance as in the direct stain. The smears were the same, with only enhanced contrast due to staining. This is because staining whether direct or indirect does not change the appearance of the smears, only improves the images. This explains why the smears did not appear different in each type of staining. When observing the cells in the plaque and those in the yeast smears, it can be noted that both contain cocci, however, the cocci in the plaque smears were in chains, whereas the cocci in the yeast smears were in clusters. The cells seen in the smear from the mouth smear yielded large, flat, irregularly shaped cells that contained a nucleus. The cells appeared to be independent of other cells and scattered about. The irregular flat shape of the cell may predict the function of this cell to protect and propel foreign substances to the back of the mouth.

My Philosophy of Teaching :: Philosophy of Education

Philosophy of Education Every high school student who plans to continue his or her education at a college or university has a reason. Some have plans to become doctors or lawyers. Other students have plans to become one of the most important members of our society, even more important than the president. Those students have plans of becoming a teacher. I am one such student. All my life, all I have ever wanted to do was teach. I loved school, for the most part. I had several teachers whom I adored. Many a summer day or snow day was spent playing school with my sister, and I was nearly always the teacher. It was a â€Å"job† I loved to have. Now, with each passing day, I am one step closer to realizing my dream of becoming an elementary teacher. I want to become a sixth grade teacher, instilling in my class the importance of education, but making the learning process fun and interesting for them at the same time. Too many students have teachers who lack the ability to hold their interest, or to make learning enjoyable for them. I want to become the exact opposite of that teacher. I believe that the overall purpose of education is to prepare our nation’s children for the various roles they will play in society, from friend to co-worker to supervisor. All the subjects I will be teaching should be preparing them for what they will become in the future: the doctor, the secretary, the computer analyst, or the teacher. But I also want to help them prepare for the social aspects of life: the mother, the father, the friend, or leader. Without the knowledge they need for whatever field they head into in life, they will not succeed, just as without the knowledge of how to be a good listener or a leader, can cause them to fail in social situations. I hope that I can show my students through my actions that it’s important to be patient and kind, even if you aren’t feeling patient or kind.

Comparison Between Healthy Food and Junk Food Essay

In today’s generation, healthy and unhealthy food plays a big role in youths and adults. Many people don’t really understand the difference between healthy and unhealthy foods, many don’t actually know what the result of eating too many unhealthy foods can do to the body. There are big differences between eating healthy food, unhealthy food and what the result of excessively eating them can do to the body. In the ongoing battle of ‘healthy vs. unhealthy foods’, unhealthy foods have their own advantage. While fast food may appear to be addictive; the ingredients may not be what is causing the addiction, rather, the habitual convenience. In this day in time, America is to lazy to cook raw, nutritious goods at home; society would rather stop by a local fast food restaurant and spend money on junk food that contains poor nutritional value, is high in fat, has preservatives, chemicals, artificial colors and flavors. Unhealthy food can hurt the body in many ways and can create diseases like: obesity, diabetes, and heart disease are major diseases and problems for the body. Sometimes you can counteract them and become healthy again, while others are irreversible and can lead to death. There are products and foods that are meant to be healthy but the producers add chemicals in them to be substitutes for the â€Å"bad stuff. † Some crop foods say that they are â€Å"all natural† when they really contain chemicals that have been added into them from the start of the process. Unlike unhealthy food, healthy food is obviously better for you and your health. people who eat healthy foods tend to have the ability and the energy to do hard work. When someone eats food that is rich in vitamins, proteins, iron and other important nutrients, they will be free from diseases and obesity. For children healthy food is necessary for proper growth and development. Parents can provide a wide variety of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and healthy proteins to make sure that their child get the right nutrients that they need to maintain a balanced diet. Although people believe that they are saving money by getting â€Å"junk food†, they are actually wasting money. In an article written by the New York Times, Is Junk Food Really Cheaper? it states that for â€Å"a typical order for a family of four†¦ costs, at the McDonald’s, about $28. † where as a healthy meal at home costsâ€Å"$14, and feed four or even six people. † Therefore it is actually cheaper to eat a well balanced meal at home, rather than a stop by the local fast food restaurant. Both junk food and Healthy food can be appetizing to your tastebuds but the clear choice to digest into your body is healthy food. Children and adults will benefit plenty by eating the right balanced foods and maintain a healthy living.

To what extent does the portrayal of women in Much Ado About Nothing subvert the conventions of the society shown in the play?

Freedom for women in the patriarchal society, in which the play is set, appears controlled and constrained in ‘Much Ado About Nothing (MAAN)’. Shakespeare employs the rebellious spirit of Beatrice in his comedy to subvert the social orthodoxy of the Elizabethan era. Hero falls victim to the suppressive nature of the dominating male characters; however Beatrice, our shrew, provides humour with her quick wit and wordplay, and a breath of fresh air for a modern feminist audience. The dramatic genre of comedy is often subversive and ‘MAAN’ definitely does not fail to live up to this expectation. With her opening line, our female protagonist subverts conventional stereotypes as she interrupts a conversation between two male speakers, questioning the return of â€Å"Signior Mountanto†. Instantly this informs us of her subversive lack of etiquette in conversation, as women would not typically speak out for themselves, especially not against a man. Her wordplay and double entendre here invokes humour firstly because the name relates to an up thrust in duelling, thus describing Benedick as a show-off, and secondly because it has sexual connotations. Beatrice’s outward smutty nature can be marked in juxtaposition to Hero’s lack of independence and confidence (a woman who occupies the role of a tragic heroine, rather than a comic one, barely utters a word throughout the play, and succumbs totally to the homosocial ruling class of Messina). Behind her witty exterior, and her constant determination not to be seen as weak, Beatrice can be seen as inquisitive about Benedick’s time away, showing she cares for him; this would conform to Renaissance standards for it was anticipated that all women would fall into the arms of a man. Being a standard feature of romantic comedy, the female protagonist typically begins by hating the man she loves, mirroring the structural pattern of beginning in discord and ending in accord. Furthermore, Beatrice, the stock character of the shrew, is exposed as a woman whose opinion of marriage definitely subverts the status quo. Asserting that she will not marry â€Å"till God make men of some other metal than earth†, her unconventionality of not wanting a husband can be seen explicitly. An Elizabethan audience could deem this to be impractical and absurd; however a contemporary feminist critic may praise her for her independence. Most noteworthy perhaps, is when she says she will â€Å"cry â€Å"Heigh-ho for a husband! †Ã¢â‚¬  illustrating that the fact she is without a lover bothers her more than we may have assumed previously. Consequently, she initiates an impetuous proposal from Don Pedro which is fascinating as we are left unsure as to whether it was merely a jest or actually sincere – this confusion and chaos being predictable of a comedy. In my opinion the proposal was sincere as Don Pedro is left unhappy at the end of the joyous comedy: â€Å"Prince, thou art sad; get thee a wife†. Although, staying true to her word, Beatrice turns down the offer, on the basis that his â€Å"Grace is too costly to wear every day. † But there is dramatic irony in this; it is evident that she does not want a husband, so the audience is fully aware that the plot will alter in due time, ending in a married Beatrice. Again, this is conventional of a romantic comedy, where the female heroine will ultimately revise her original opinion of the man. Additionally, Beatrice’s discontent with the lack of respect and regard she receives as a woman manifests itself in her wish that she was a man. Beatrice is clearly aware of her inability to act against Claudio (purely because of her gender), after he shuns Hero at the altar. Beatrice declares â€Å"O God, that I were a man! I would eat his heart in the market place! † The metaphor used here creates an image of a savage and ruthless Beatrice (implying she would kill Claudio, rip his heart out and then eat it); traits which definitely are not associated with the conservative women of the Elizabethan era. However, some may deem her subversion of the gender roles here as positively defiant. Although verbally expressing her anguish, Beatrice â€Å"too, in this patriarchal society, must be dependent on a man to make right prevail†, as Penny Gay says, and this disheartens the audience. Thus, Beatrice turns to a man to carry out her wish for her: â€Å"Come, bid me do anything for thee. † Also note Benedick’s reaction to this request; he succumbs to Beatrice’s influence, and in consequence reverses the established gender roles in Renaissance society. The consistent sexual innuendo Beatrice insinuates in her speech is undeniably subversive. Bawdy language, not generally used by young, conventional women, presents Beatrice as characteristically more masculine than feminine: â€Å"With a good leg and a good foot, uncle†. There is a sexual pun on the word â€Å"foot†, perhaps linking to the unmannerly French ‘foutre’, as to suggest an adept lover during copulation – women having openly sexual desires during Elizabethan times was very distasteful, making the comment even more significant. It is also vital to note Leonato’s response to such language stating to â€Å"be so shrewd of thy tongue† â€Å"wilt never get thee a husband†, as if almost presuming Beatrice aspires to be wedded and oppressed. Moreover, deception and mistaken identity, features typical of comedy, allow Beatrice to subvert the status quo even further when she has the upper hand on Benedick, at the masked ball. The humour present is in the dramatic irony that Benedick is unaware that she knows who he is; he feels he is at an advantage by being able to hear what Beatrice ‘thinks about him’. Yet, it is Beatrice who is truly at an advantage, for she can in fact balance the power between the sexes, by ‘indirectly’ insulting Benedick, the â€Å"very dull fool†. Not only is the use of disguise a catalyst for humour, but Beatrice’s, debatably, greater intelligence challenges the conventional view that men are superior to women in every aspect. However, the structure of ‘MAAN’ enables the reader to recognise the chronological downfall of Beatrice’s wild spirit and liberation. The ending, with its characteristic comic resolution of marriage, also sees Beatrice being silenced by Benedick, significantly on the day of their wedding. The literal kiss, used to cease her independence, is preceded by the imperative â€Å"Peace! I will stop your mouth. † The fact that the feisty Beatrice is letting herself be silenced, which is marked in stark contrast to the â€Å"rare parrot-teacher† we met at the beginning of the play, demonstrates the restrictive nature of marriage for women. The timing of the kiss, right at the end of the play, gives a lasting feeling that Beatrice will stay submissive to her husband after the play ends. As Jacob Lund argues â€Å"the marriage of Beatrice and Benedick seems at first to offer a different view of what constitutes social order in the world of the play† with their repartee and Beatrice’s confidence, seen clearly when she remains contentious just before becoming a wife, stating she will â€Å"take thee for pity†. In spite of this critic’s view, I think the uniform structure of comedy, concluding with the restoration of order, means that it is only natural that Beatrice should be suppressed before long. It is clear that Shakespeare has created a realistic ending; perhaps it was too idealistic to assume Beatrice would claim superiority in the relationship? Inconsistent to Beatrice’s early assertions that she would â€Å"rather hear my dog bark at a crow than a man swear he loves me†, she suddenly appears ditsy and romantic on discovering Benedick’s love for her. Conforming to the stock character of an adoring, courtly lover she exclaims â€Å"Benedick, love on; I will requite thee† in her passionate soliloquy written in strictly formal Elizabethan iambic pentameter verse; the form giving this gulling scene a much more serious tone than the previous. The explicit parallel between the two scenes, both beset with comic deception, marks a contrast between the soliloquies of Beatrice, and her male counterpart, Benedick. In comparison to Benedick, Beatrice’s fall from disdain has less of a dramatic impact, accentuating her sincerity and glee, whereas Benedick has to give himself reasons to requite her love, and consider how others will react. This undoubtedly presents Beatrice as the feebler and more vulnerable of the sexes. There is now even more of an inevitability surrounding her imminent submission to a controlling husband, as she tames â€Å"my wild heart to thy loving hand† just as she was expected to do. A feminist critic would argue that the play’s heroine has just sold out to tradition by adhering to a life of matrimony. This scene is hyperbolic in the 1993 Kenneth Branagh film version, and Josie Rourke's production of the Shakespearean comedy. This adds great comic effect as Beatrice cries out her love in an over exaggerated and quixotic fashion; arguably too extravagant? The view that some of the comic heroines in ‘MAAN’ may fall into the typical portrayal of women as passive and compliant, has some credibility. However, the unconventional wit and defiance of Beatrice outweighs the previous statement, and provides exactly what a comedy is made for: humour. It is arguable that the play ends badly from a feminist critic’s point of view as social order and the expected position of the sexes is restored (just as is anticipated, due to the comic structure). Nevertheless, mocking, transgressing and subverting the status quo will always be at the very heart of comedy, and ‘MAAN’ corresponds totally to this notion, especially in its depiction of the unforgettable character, Beatrice.

Free Essays on Women Right To Vote

Women's Right to Vote Written by: Lm4103082 After reading Francis Parkman's article, â€Å"Women Are Unfit to Vote†, I found myself both offended and annoyed. His arguments were not only shaky, but they were also illogical. He states that the family has been the political unit; consequently, the head of the family should be the political representative. He goes on by stating that women have shared imperfectly in the traditions and not in the practice of self-government. Lastly, he suggests women might vote that men should go off and fight in war. Not only are these statements wrong, but they are very much so offensive. Women are humans, too, and they should be treated how a man is treated. We are, after all, of an equal race, so why do we women not get the right to vote? In my opinion,this question cannot be answered logically. Many reasons can contradict Parkman’s statements included in his article, and I plan to do so. To start with, Parkman declares that â€Å"the family, and not the individual, has been the political unit, and the head of the family... has been the political representative of the rest.† He is saying that the men are the head of the family; therefore, they should be the ones that vote. But what if the head of the family is a woman? Let’s say, for example, the husband dies unexpectedly, leaving the woman behind to raise the children and take the position as head of the family. Does she then get the right to vote? Or do we simply deny her that right because she is a woman? According to Francis Parkman, the head of the family is the political representative, and no where in that statement did he once specify the head of the family could not be a woman. Therefore, as long as the woman is the head of the family, they should be granted the right to vote. Many circumstances in one’s life may cause them to become, without notice, the head of their family. As quick as they become the new head, they should then b... Free Essays on Women Right To Vote Free Essays on Women Right To Vote Women's Right to Vote Written by: Lm4103082 After reading Francis Parkman's article, â€Å"Women Are Unfit to Vote†, I found myself both offended and annoyed. His arguments were not only shaky, but they were also illogical. He states that the family has been the political unit; consequently, the head of the family should be the political representative. He goes on by stating that women have shared imperfectly in the traditions and not in the practice of self-government. Lastly, he suggests women might vote that men should go off and fight in war. Not only are these statements wrong, but they are very much so offensive. Women are humans, too, and they should be treated how a man is treated. We are, after all, of an equal race, so why do we women not get the right to vote? In my opinion,this question cannot be answered logically. Many reasons can contradict Parkman’s statements included in his article, and I plan to do so. To start with, Parkman declares that â€Å"the family, and not the individual, has been the political unit, and the head of the family... has been the political representative of the rest.† He is saying that the men are the head of the family; therefore, they should be the ones that vote. But what if the head of the family is a woman? Let’s say, for example, the husband dies unexpectedly, leaving the woman behind to raise the children and take the position as head of the family. Does she then get the right to vote? Or do we simply deny her that right because she is a woman? According to Francis Parkman, the head of the family is the political representative, and no where in that statement did he once specify the head of the family could not be a woman. Therefore, as long as the woman is the head of the family, they should be granted the right to vote. Many circumstances in one’s life may cause them to become, without notice, the head of their family. As quick as they become the new head, they should then b...

Freedom From the Wall Professor Ramos Blog

Freedom From the Wall Jessica Hilder American Literature II 20 February 2019 â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† and the Consequences of How Women Were Viewed â€Å"In a sick society, women who have difficulty fitting in are not ill but demonstrating a healthy and positive response.† This is a quote by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, a writer who was born during the height of the feminist movement; during a time where women writers were exploding in popularity. Many men thought of female writers as, â€Å"being brainy, selfish, unladylike, and unattractive† (â€Å"1862: The Explosion of Women Writers† by Christopher Hager). These women were criticized for simply being female, and their works were seen as inadequate (Hager, par. 3). Many female literary artists fought this view, Gilman included. In fact, as the quote suggests, she herself was a feminist. In 1891, she published a work in the New England Magazine. Her biggest reason for publishing the story was because she wanted to expose how being told to never work again is not a proper treatment for any illness, though she was prescribed exactly that by a physician and nearly went insane because of it. This is where her inspiration for â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† came from (The Norton Anthology: American Literature). The purpose of this essay is to go through â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† and discuss the conflict in the story, and the consequences of that conflict for the characters involved. â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper† is about an unnamed woman, and it seems to be in her point of view through journals. She mentions a few times that she’s writing in secret and doesn’t want her husband to know. The narrator also mentions how she is ill, and her husband, John, a physician, suggested that she do no work until she is well again. This is important to the story, because during this time, many physicians believed that women would get sick if they were reading or writing. This is evident in Gilman’s own experiences, as she wrote this story to be semiautobiographical. When talking about why she wrote The Yellow Wallpaper, she said, â€Å"For many years, I suffered from a severe and continuous nervous breakdown tending to melancholia†¦ I went†¦ to a noted specialist in nervous diseases, the best known in the country. This wise man put me to bed and applied the rest cure†¦ and sent me home with solemn advice to ‘live as domestic a life as far as possible,’ to, ‘have but two hours’ intellectual life a day,’ and ‘never to touch pen, brush, or pencil again as long as I lived’ (Gilman, 523-524). Gilman followed these instructions for three months before, as she put it, she came to, â€Å"the border line of utter mental ruin that I could see over† (Gilman, 524). She immediately started working once again and wrote â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper.† One can see how Gilman meant for this to reflect on what she went through, as John gives the narrator of the story the same treatment. However, despite her husband’s instructions, the narrator continues to write in secret. Her husband is gone most of the time though, because he is a physician, so she is able to get away with it. The conflict seems to start early here. Already, her husband is telling her the way to get better is to do absolutely nothing, and to stop writing because he believes it’s making her sick. The narrator mentions that she does feel more exhausted from writing, but only because she must hide it. She often talks about the room she is living in and goes into detail about the wallpaper. At one point, she talks about two â€Å"bulbous eyes [staring] at you upside down.† She talks about how it seems to crawl up, down, sideways. As the story continues, she mentions that she sees the shape of the woman. Yet, as her mental state is obviously deteriorating, John seems to continually brush her off when she attempts to talk to him about how she doesn’t feel like she’s getting any better. He constantly treats her like a child, carrying her upstairs and reading to her, scolding her when she doesn’t do what he wants her to do, or calling her things like, â€Å"little girl,† hinting towards the possibility of thinking less of his wife. Further, during the 19th century, mental illness was a relatively new medical field, therefore not many people knew much about it. John was a physician, but most likely knew nothing about mental illness and was not able to see the signs that his wife displayed. It could also be assumed that, had John been more present during this time, maybe he would have seen some signs of it; yet it is stated multiple times that he is gone for long hours because of work. Throughout the story, she seems to have worse hallucinations as time goes on. For example, at one point, she talks about how the â€Å"woman behind [the wallpaper]† as she calls her, escapes during the day and â€Å"creeps† (or crawls) outside of her windows. She says, â€Å"It is the same woman, I know, for she is always creeping, and most women do not creep by daylight†¦ and when a carriage comes she hides under the blackberry vines. I don’t blame her a bit. It must be very humiliating to be caught creeping by daylight!† (Gilman, 520) This seems to add to the consequences of the conflict, as the conflict so far seems to be that her husband seems to think little of her, perhaps because she is a woman. This is evidenced by his hesitancy to believe she is sick, or at the very least, that she is as sick as she thinks. Not only that, but it is evidenced from his treating her like a child, as pointed out above. Unfortunately, the story ends with the narrator seemingly going into complete madness. This is evidenced by her stating that she sees multiple women creeping outside her window, and she doesn’t like to look at them. She also seems to believe she is the woman behind the wallpaper as she says things such as, â€Å"I wonder if they all come out of that wallpaper as I did,† â€Å"I suppose I shall have to get back behind the pattern when it comes night, and that is hard!† and to John she says, â€Å"I’ve got out at last, in spite of you and Jane! And I’ve pulled off most of the paper, so you can’t put me back!† (Gilman, 523) The story even ends with her creeping back and forth in the room, even over her unconscious husband who passed out upon seeing her in her current state. This part is extremely important, because one could see this as coming from her feeling trapped in the house. Perhaps she was the woman behind the wallpaper the entire time. Her descent into madness could have been fought or treated, but one could say it’s safe to assume that, being a woman, many people in the story assumed she was exaggerating or making a problem when there was none. Unfortunately, this was not uncommon. As stated earlier, mental illness was a new medical field. Therefore, many physicians depended upon social norms such as heredity, environment, gender, class, or sinful behavior to determine whether someone had a mental illness (â€Å"The Language of Madness: Understanding Terminology†). The ultimate consequence of the conflict in this story is the narrator’s mental illness getting worse and worse until she had a nervous breakdown. As mentioned earlier, Gilman herself even stated that she nearly descended into madness because of a similar wellness plan by her own physician; that was the whole purpose of writing the story. Thankfully, there was a resolution to this conflict, though not in the story. Gilman said in the end that, â€Å"Many years later, I was told that the great specialist had admitted to friends of his that he had altered his treatment of neurasthenia since reading ‘The Yellow Wallpaper.’† (Gilman, 524) Gilman’s story had affected many different people besides just the original physician that attempted to treat her. She says that it’s, â€Å"valued by alienists,† and that, â€Å"it saved one woman from a similar fate- so terrifying her family that they let her out into normal activity and she recovered.† (Gilman, 524) In conclusion, the point of this essay was to discuss the conflict present in â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper,† as well as the consequences of said conflict. There seems to be a few different points of conflict; the view of women in that society through John’s view of his wife, and the view of mental illness during this time through the narrator’s treatment plan as well as how she is treated by those around her. The ultimate consequence was the worsening of her mental illness. The quote used at the beginning of this essay is very fitting for this discussion. As mentioned earlier, many believed that when women worked or did any reading or writing, they would get sick. However, through Gilman’s own experiences and the experience of the narrator in her short story, she was able to prove that the opposite is true; in fact, she got more sick when she stopped working altogether. During this time, it was uncommon for women to read and write, and was against social norms. She proved her own quote to be correct. She did not fit in during her time, yet she was definitely demonstrating a healthy and positive response by fighting the stereotypes present during that time. A lot of good seems to have come from this story, and hopefully there were many women who were saved by Gilman’s short story besides the one mentioned earlier. Thankfully, women’s rights have come a long way since then, as well as the study of mental illness. Despite this, it’s good to look at works such as these so that the mistakes of the past are not repeated. Works Cited Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. â€Å"The Yellow Wallpaper.† The Norton Anthology of American Literature, by Robert S. Levine, W. W. Norton Company, 2017, pp. 509–524. Hager, Christopher. â€Å"1862: The Explosion of Women Writers.† 1862: America Undeceived, 20 Dec. 2012, commons.trincoll.edu/1862/2012/12/20/1862-the-explosion-of-women-writers/#_ftn1. â€Å"The Language of Madness: Understanding Terminology.†Restoring Perspective: Life and Treatment at Londons Asylum, 2009, lib.uwo.ca/archives/virtualexhibits/londonasylum/terminology.html.